![]() 06/11/2015 at 11:16 • Filed to: OPPOSITELOCK REVIEW, REVIEW, OPPO REVIEW | ![]() | ![]() |
( Full Disclosure: Chevrolet wanted me to test the 2010 Colorado LT V8 so badly they arranged to build and sell it to some old fart who would use it lightly until I was ready to buy, who would then trade it in.)
Exterior - 9/10
I find people either love or hate the looks of this truck. I love it. 1 point off for the chrome, but that’s being taken care of.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
Interior - 5/10
Everything you need, nothing you don’t. A solid 5/10 for that.
+1 for a great gauge cluster.
-1 for the steering wheel lifted straight from a Daewoo Lacetti
-1 for the Uplander shifter. It’s not that bad when you get used to it, but it’s pretty awful at first.
+1 for everything being layed out simply and intuitively.
+1 for a rather attractive, simple design. I quite like it. A few accents to break up the black, not too much.
-1 for that attractive design going to shit when you start touching things. Seriously, with the amount of hard plastic in here, you could completely rebuild Cher.
+1 for nice comfy seats.
-1 for those nice, comfy seats going to shit when you try to take a corner. The only way these seats have enough bolstering to keep you from making skidmarks on the door handle is if you’re a lazy orangutang with a glandular problem if you don’t have a wheel to hang on to.
0 (or +1/-1, this is really one point with two elements that counteract each other) The hard plastic is quite durable. It also means the console squeaks like hell.
+1 for a decent amount of space in the rear.
-1 for the ridiculous placement of the cupholders. Sure it sort of redeems itself by being a good place for a garbage bag, but then so does Cleveland. It also comes loose very easily.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
Acceleration - 8/10
It’s no supercar, or, these days, even a sports car, but I think it’s highly respectable for what it is. The official tests put 0-60 anywhere between 6.7 and 7.3 seconds depending on the variant. I’m probably in the 7-7.3 region. How it FEELS, though... getting booted in the ass by that torque is awesome.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
Braking - 7/10
It has brakes. They work. Well. Even considering the rear drums. They overpower the tires quite easily (not a good thing, but that wasn’t the question. The question was does it have good brakes), and ABS isn’t too intrusive(good thing). They do have the typical “stock-gm-brake-shake(TM)”, but not as bad as many. They are also a little grabby.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
Ride - 6/10
It rides great on a smooth road (duh), rides meh on a due for maintenance road, rides crap on a Toronto road, and rides fun on a construction/under construction road. Stock rear leaf springs are pretty weak, so it does do a bit of bouncing.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
Handling - 6/10
Depends entirely on my mood and the weather conditions, due to the fact that it will handle if you force it to but would rather not. The best way to describe it is by going back to that Top Gear episode where Hammond tested the Cayman(Boxter?) and Z4 back to back. The Cayman(Boxter?) would make the best of whatever you chose to fling at it. The Z4, handled in the same way would put you in a hedge. Like the Z4, the Colorado makes you work for it if you want it. Eg:
If I’m tired, the handling sucks, because I’m not really concerned with it being fun. I’m treating the Z4 like a Cayman(Boxter?) and it doesn’t like it.
If I’m in the snow in 4hi it becomes very predictable and balanced, and it’s phenomenal fun. The fact that the slippery surface eliminates much of the body roll could have something to do with that.
It comes to this. It definitely doesn’t handle well enough to get any more than 6, but I’ve got enough fun out of it that there isn’t a chance of an icicle in hell I’m going any lower. :)
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
Gearbox - 4/10
The weak spot in this truck is the transmission, being a low-end 4auto and paired with GM’s torque management, but it’s OK most of the time. It’s predictable and correct 85-90% of the time. Basically, if you roll on to the throttle, it’ll pick up fine except when coasting down to a light that suddenly goes green. Then that 4l60e can frankly go f*ck itself with the wrong end of a chainsaw. It slams around doing who knows what. If you don’t roll on, torque management goes nuts and you go nowhere. It’s weird to say about an auto, but get it right and it’s awesome. Get it wrong and you’d rather be riding a camel while very hung over.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
Toys - 6/10
I honestly don’t know what you could call a toy on this thing. Time to start splitting hairs.
In-dash CD changer, A/C, heated seats, and aftermarket aux input... that’s pretty much it. Unless you count 4lo and rear locker. I count that.
There’s also a cool feature built into the tailgate cables that allow you to have it sit half open, letting you transport 4x8 sheets that otherwise wouldn’t fit between the wheel wells.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
Audio - 10/10
Quite Nice. How do you describe and audio system other than that?
Besides... V8 NOISE
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
Value - 7/10
Shit. I have no idea. They are hard to find and tend to be expensive, but then they seem to be holding their value well so far, so that balances out. Mine only dropped $7-8000 in 4.5 years, there are low-mileage examples going for more than they were worth new. That’s probably going to change when the 2016 diesel’s come out though. I’m just going to say 7 at a guess.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
Total - 68/100
Engine:
5.3L V8 LH9
Power: 300 horsepower/320 LB-FT torque
Transmission:
4-speed automatic w/ overdrive
0-60 Time:
7-7.3 seconds
Top Speed: 160kph limited.
Drivetrain: RWD/4WD
Curb weight:
3,600 lbs
Seating: 5 people
MPG:
14.1l/100km city/9l/100km highway. At least officially. It’s a pipe dream, but I’m not sure exactly how far off I am, so make do with that.
Price:
$21,000 as tested before taxes.
![]() 06/11/2015 at 11:24 |
|
Canada? with your demon metric.
WHAT DOES IT MEAN!>?!
![]() 06/11/2015 at 11:28 |
|
The V8 version? Nice find. I think the only trickier find for this platform would be the H3t Alpha.
![]() 06/11/2015 at 11:28 |
|
The rest of the world? With you’re demon metric.
FTFY
I figured since I’m Canuck people wouldn’t be sure if it was US or Imperial MPG.
For US, 16-26mpg. Like I said, pipe dream. I have seen 21 hwy@75mph quoted though.
![]() 06/11/2015 at 11:40 |
|
It’s funny, I’ve actually really liked the look of these. More than the new version.
Also have been curious about how it is because I almost want to look at ones with a MT...wonder if I can get a V8.........................
![]() 06/11/2015 at 11:41 |
|
No V8 for manual unless you swap it.
#sosad
![]() 06/11/2015 at 11:48 |
|
“...rides crap on a Toronto road, and rides fun on a construction/under construction road.”
Discrepancy here: Toronto roads are always under construction.
![]() 06/11/2015 at 11:49 |
|
Didn’t expect one but I could dream.
Fuckin inline 4 only.
![]() 06/11/2015 at 12:03 |
|
No, there are 2 types of Toronto road. Under construction, and needs to be under construction.
By process of elimination, a Toronto road is one badly in need of repair :)
![]() 06/11/2015 at 12:04 |
|
Or 5...
Apparently the 3.7 I5 isn’t half bad with a tune.
![]() 06/11/2015 at 12:19 |
|
I NEED a V8 back in my life haha. You happy with it? (I mean, you seem it)
![]() 06/11/2015 at 12:23 |
|
It’s a very give-and-take experience, but overall...
yeah. I’m happy. And when I’m not all I have to do is roll down the window and roll on the pedal on the right :)
![]() 06/11/2015 at 12:23 |
|
Amen to that. My personal favourite is getting caught in traffic on the 401 at two in the morning because of construction work.
![]() 06/11/2015 at 12:24 |
|
2am??? Wow. East end?
![]() 06/11/2015 at 12:26 |
|
Might want to add that up again, unless there some conversion from metric to ‘merica im missing.
Though nice truck. Love that GM was bold enough to just slap in a V8. From what i remember though the back seats dont have much head space
![]() 06/11/2015 at 12:28 |
|
What do you get? I ran through quick and got 68.
![]() 06/11/2015 at 12:29 |
|
Yup. Close to the 401 and the DVP.
![]() 06/11/2015 at 12:31 |
|
That explains it, I’m Etobicoke. 2am is about the only time the 401 ISN’T stopped.
![]() 06/11/2015 at 12:32 |
|
Changed.
How tall are you, I never had any complaints about the back. But then I’m not very tall :)
![]() 06/11/2015 at 13:06 |
|
Yep got 68. Im almost 6’ and felt like there wasnt much room, my brother is 6’ 2” and he was hitting his head sitting straight up. But this was when they first came out with the 4 door in like 04-05 so i could be remembering it wrong.
![]() 06/11/2015 at 14:22 |
|
Third road option! The roads that are covered in the debris from the DVP above it... Ughhh.
![]() 06/11/2015 at 14:24 |
|
Or Lakeshore under the Gardner.
![]() 06/11/2015 at 14:27 |
|
Yes! It’s the Gardner that is falling apart isn’t it? I stay the hell away from that city at all costs so I kinda have forgotten where the broken roads are.
![]() 06/11/2015 at 14:34 |
|
I’ll give you the short version of what roads are broken in Toronto:
-All of them
![]() 06/11/2015 at 14:52 |
|
That’s what I figured. I have been in Waterloo a lot recently, and I can say the same about the roads there. They are putting in this god awful “light rail transit” thing and they decided to tear up every single road that it will be servicing. This is the transit thing that the City of Toronto practically begged Waterloo Region to not build. However they did not listen.
Moral of the story is, roads are all torn up everywhere (all major main streets), thank god my taxes aren’t going to that clusterfuck!
![]() 06/12/2015 at 14:26 |
|
I have always had an urge for a V8 one of these, they just cost too much for me
![]() 06/15/2015 at 15:13 |
|
Crazy 9 year old me thought I was gonna get an H3T when I turned 17. Sadly, a month into being 17, I don’t have an H3T.